Sunday, March 20, 2016

Sebi to Define 'Control', Proposes 25% Voting Right Threshold

Sebi to Define 'Control', Proposes 25% Voting Right Threshold

Press Trust of India | Last Updated: March 12, 2016 20:37 (IST)

New Delhi: For better clarity on change of control in mergers and acquisitions, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Saturday decided to launch a public consultation for defining 'control' and proposed fixing 25 per cent voting rights as a threshold.

In this regard, the market regulator will initiate public consultation on bright line tests for acquiring control in a listed entity.

The approval of the proposal by Sebi's board comes against the backdrop of instances of ambiguity and concerns over control in some listed entities.

During the meeting on Saturday, the board approved the proposal for public consultation process regarding "bright line tests for acquisition of control under Sebi (SAST) Regulations, 2011".

The market watchdog will come out with an illustrative list of protective rights that will not amount to acquisition of control and grant of such rights will be subject to obtaining public shareholders' approval.

"Considering the international practices and the current regulatory environment in India, the definition of control may be amended such that control is defined as the right or entitlement to exercise at least 25 per cent of voting rights of a company irrespective of whether such holding gives de facto control and/or the right to appoint a majority of the non-independent directors of a company," the release said.

Other options will also be considered after the public consultation.

Currently, assessment of control requires consideration of facts and circumstances of each case. As a result, there have been multiple shades of opinion.

Besides, multiple regulators apply the test of control from different perspectives resulting in ambiguities.

Under SEBI regulations, control is based on certain defined principles rather than on rules and there have been cases when a multitude of opinion gives rise to different assessments of control over a listed company.

A bright-line rule or a bright-line test generally refers to a simple and basic standard that can be applied to remove ambiguity and resolve contentious issues.

In cases of mergers and acquisitions, an acquirer or any other entity would be considered to be gaining control of the target company if it fulfills the bright line tests with regard to acquisition of voting rights, control over operations and influence in board decisions.

There have been many cases, including in the much talked about Jet-Etihad deal, when the issue of control was debated a lot and it was felt that Sebi needs to put in place specific guidelines defining bright lines to determine the control.

SEBI has received representations from various investor groups and other entities, seeking some kind of guidance with a view to providing more clarity on the definition of control and defining bright lines on the same.

Fair trade regulator CCI (Competition Commission of India) had first pointed out in its order on Jet-Etihad deal that the various pacts between the two companies indicated Etihad Airways' joint control over Jet Airways.


Story first published on: March 12, 2016 20:27 (IST)

http://profit.ndtv.com/news/market/article-sebi-to-define-control-proposes-25-voting-right-threshold-1286531

Monday, March 7, 2016

Tackling bad debt: 27 public sector banks may be merged into six

Mon, 7 Mar 2016-09:35am , Mumbai , dna web desk

Consolidation of PSBs will take place with the setting up of an expert committee which would work along with the Banks Board Bureau (BBB) to identify the right matches

Consolidation is seen as the way forward for the India's public sector banks (PSBs) that have been reeling under the pressure of mounting bad loans. Participants of the Gyan Sangam event, which is organised for heads of PSBs and financial institution said that this could bring the number of banks to six from the present 27, according to a Hindustan Times report.

According to the report, the time frame for the mergers will ensure that there are no disruptions and that since these banks are short-staffed there would be no need for downsizing.

The consolidation will take place with the setting up of an expert committee which would work along with the Banks Board Bureau (BBB) to identify the right matches. The BBB will be put in place by April 1, 2016 and will independently oversee consolidation and chalk out business plans for PSBs.

Participants from the events said that since it is not feasible to bring down the government's share in state-owned banks below 51%, consolidation to create strong banks is the only option, according to the report.

Some of the things that will be critical in the consolidation process would include issues such as technology, asset base, regional strength and cultural match.

A senior government official in the report said that at present the PSBs are fighting with each other for market share, but with so many payments and small finance banks coming there is a need to consolidate and focus on the balance sheets to create big banks.

The finance ministry is already planning to merge newly-launched Bharatiya Mahila Bank.

The official also added that the government would intervene in case certain banks show unwillingness to merge after the plans are created by the BBB and the expert committee.

The government until now had maintained that it would not involve itself in any merger exercise of public sector banks.

The government in Budget 2016 had reported the infusion of Rs 25,000 crore into ailing PSBs and added that it would unveil its consolidation plans.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley too had said that the government would set up an expert group on the consolidation of banks.


http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report-govt-may-form-6-stong-banks-from-merger-of-27-psbs-to-tackle-rising-bad-loan-issue-2186336