Economic Times: 21/10/2010
Opposition Due To Advantage Of Overseas Buyers Over Indian Cos
Reena Zachariah MUMBAI THE Securities and Exchange Board of India,or Sebi, is set to unveil new rules on takeover of public listed firms based on the recommendations of a committee headed by C Achuthan,but may stop short of implementing a key proposal that envisages a mandatory open offer for 100% of the equity of a company by an acquirer.
Reena Zachariah MUMBAI THE Securities and Exchange Board of India,or Sebi, is set to unveil new rules on takeover of public listed firms based on the recommendations of a committee headed by C Achuthan,but may stop short of implementing a key proposal that envisages a mandatory open offer for 100% of the equity of a company by an acquirer.
The Sebi board,which is scheduled to meet on Monday,will discuss the overhaul of the takeover rules,notably an increase in the limit for triggering open offers to 25% from 15% and doing away with the concept of a non-compete fee to promoters.However,considering the resistance from industry bodies or lobbying arms of corporates,merchant bankers,corporate lawyers and fund managers,the capital market regulator may have to take a hard look at the proposal that makes it obligatory on all acquirers to buy out 100% of the equity of a target company,according to a senior official in Sebi.
This official said the bulk of the comments that it has received from industry as well as capital market intermediaries,including merchant bankers,related to this proposal.The opposition to this proposal stems from the fact that overseas acquirers have an advantage over their Indian counterparts.Indian corporates cannot access bank funds for buying out a company as RBI does not permit banks to fund such an activity.In contrast,many foreign companies do not face such restrictions and that makes it easier for them to make an aggressive bid for controlling local firms.
The 25% threshold for triggering a tender offer moves us closer to norms in other countries.Requiring the tender offer to be for all 100% appears fair to minority shareholders,but then building in a squeezeout provision would make it fair for acquirers, said Anantharaman,MD & head-corporate advisory & finance,Standard Chartered.